BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

SUZUKI RG125F

124cc Petrol Class 1
#5057 of 5426 overall #672 of 680 SUZUKIs #540 of 734 commuter bikes
64.0%
first-time pass rate
27.4%
failed outright
22,719
median miles at test
508
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2012

The RG125F's first-time pass rate has risen 1.6 points since 2006, 52.9% to 54.5%.

47%65%83%2006: 52.9% pass (68 tests)2007: 55.1% pass (49 tests)2008: 55.3% pass (47 tests)2009: 63.6% pass (44 tests)2010: 76.7% pass (30 tests)2012: 54.5% pass (33 tests)20062012

Pass rate by mileage

how the RG125F's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage RG125F passes first time 73.8% of the time; by 30k that's 65.3%.

59%68%76%0k: 73.8% pass (42 tests)10k: 65.3% pass (147 tests)20k: 61.4% pass (197 tests)30k: 65.3% pass (95 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a RG125F

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
145 26.9 3.6×
brakes
129 23.9 3.9×
steering and suspension
106 19.6 4.2×
drive system
49 9.1 8.5×
body and structure
40 7.4 10.3×
tyres and wheels
31 5.7 2.4×
fuel and exhaust
19 3.5 4.1×
lamps and reflectors
10 1.9 0.8×
reg plates and vin
8 1.5 2.7×
suspension
3 0.6 0.8×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the RG125F beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YBR 125, HONDA CG125, HONDA CBF125).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the RG125F.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1995 (68.1% pass). Weakest: 1993 (57.3%).

55%63%70%1992: 63.1% pass (130 tests)1993: 57.3% pass (96 tests)1994: 64.5% pass (107 tests)1995: 68.1% pass (72 tests)199219941995

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI RG125F FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI RG125F reliable?

The SUZUKI RG125F is less reliable than average for its class: 64.0% of its 508 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #5057 of 5426 models.

What does a RG125F fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 27% of all defects recorded against failed RG125F tests.

What is the best year of RG125F to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1995-registered examples do best (68.1%) and 1993 worst (57.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a RG125F last?

The median RG125F shows 22,719 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 65.3% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.