BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

SUZUKI RG125

124cc Petrol Class 1
#5143 of 5426 overall #676 of 680 SUZUKIs #587 of 734 commuter bikes
62.0%
first-time pass rate
27.8%
failed outright
20,230
median miles at test
1,593
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2023

The RG125's first-time pass rate has risen 14.4 points since 2005, 70.0% to 84.4%.

38%66%94%2005: 70.0% pass (50 tests)2006: 56.5% pass (200 tests)2007: 58.8% pass (148 tests)2008: 56.1% pass (132 tests)2009: 50.0% pass (108 tests)2010: 66.3% pass (104 tests)2011: 51.9% pass (104 tests)2012: 51.5% pass (99 tests)2013: 47.3% pass (112 tests)2014: 60.9% pass (87 tests)2015: 70.2% pass (84 tests)2016: 69.2% pass (65 tests)2017: 77.6% pass (58 tests)2018: 68.8% pass (32 tests)2019: 76.5% pass (34 tests)2022: 79.4% pass (34 tests)2023: 84.4% pass (32 tests)20052023

Pass rate by mileage

how the RG125's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage RG125 passes first time 75.8% of the time; by 40k that's 59.5%.

52%66%80%0k: 75.8% pass (248 tests)10k: 62.7% pass (536 tests)20k: 56.1% pass (503 tests)30k: 58.1% pass (203 tests)40k: 59.5% pass (74 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a RG125

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
570 32.7 4.4×
steering and suspension
411 23.6 4.9×
brakes
368 21.1 3.3×
drive system
107 6.1 7.0×
body and structure
99 5.7 10.3×
tyres and wheels
70 4 1.9×
fuel and exhaust
51 2.9 4.0×
reg plates and vin
34 1.9 3.4×
lamps and reflectors
22 1.3 0.5×
structure and attachments
13 0.7 1.0×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the RG125 beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YBR 125, HONDA CG125, HONDA CBF125).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the RG125.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1989 (76.2% pass). Weakest: 1987 (43.8%).

37%60%83%1986: 65.4% pass (136 tests)1987: 43.8% pass (64 tests)1988: 63.6% pass (88 tests)1989: 76.2% pass (130 tests)1990: 62.2% pass (127 tests)1991: 62.1% pass (66 tests)1992: 61.6% pass (258 tests)1993: 58.4% pass (279 tests)1994: 55.7% pass (192 tests)1995: 60.9% pass (92 tests)198619911995

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI RG125 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI RG125 reliable?

The SUZUKI RG125 is less reliable than average for its class: 62.0% of its 1,593 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #5143 of 5426 models.

What does a RG125 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 33% of all defects recorded against failed RG125 tests.

What is the best year of RG125 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1989-registered examples do best (76.2%) and 1987 worst (43.8%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a RG125 last?

The median RG125 shows 20,230 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 59.5% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.