BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

SUZUKI RF900

937cc Petrol Class 2
80.0%
first-time pass rate
12.7%
failed outright
30,110
median miles at test
2,214
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The RF900's first-time pass rate has risen 6.2 points since 2006, 81.3% to 87.5%.

64%82%100%2006: 81.3% pass (192 tests)2007: 85.3% pass (177 tests)2008: 75.3% pass (170 tests)2009: 76.6% pass (154 tests)2010: 81.1% pass (148 tests)2011: 71.9% pass (146 tests)2012: 75.6% pass (135 tests)2013: 80.9% pass (131 tests)2014: 79.9% pass (139 tests)2015: 75.6% pass (127 tests)2016: 79.8% pass (109 tests)2017: 83.7% pass (98 tests)2018: 88.6% pass (70 tests)2019: 82.7% pass (75 tests)2020: 69.8% pass (53 tests)2021: 93.9% pass (66 tests)2022: 86.7% pass (60 tests)2023: 75.0% pass (56 tests)2024: 91.1% pass (45 tests)2025: 87.5% pass (40 tests)20062025

Pass rate by mileage

how the RF900's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage RF900 passes first time 81.8% of the time; by 50k that's 67.3%.

64%77%90%0k: 81.8% pass (99 tests)10k: 86.3% pass (424 tests)20k: 82.5% pass (577 tests)30k: 77.8% pass (590 tests)40k: 78.4% pass (292 tests)50k: 67.3% pass (165 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a RF900

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
184 27.3 1.2×
lighting and signalling
169 25 1.3×
steering and suspension
137 20.3 1.5×
tyres and wheels
63 9.3 1.3×
lamps and reflectors
40 5.9 0.9×
drive system
34 5 1.6×
suspension
13 1.9 0.7×
fuel and exhaust
13 1.9 0.7×
body and structure
12 1.8 1.0×
reg plates and vin
10 1.5 0.6×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the RF900 beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (BMW R1200, BMW R1150, TRIUMPH SPRINT).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the RF900.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1999 (87.0% pass). Weakest: 1994 (77.2%).

75%82%89%1994: 77.2% pass (744 tests)1995: 80.6% pass (648 tests)1996: 81.9% pass (520 tests)1997: 80.0% pass (105 tests)1998: 85.0% pass (60 tests)1999: 87.0% pass (92 tests)199419971999

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI RF900 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI RF900 reliable?

The SUZUKI RF900 is less reliable than average for its class: 80.0% of its 2,214 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3577 of 5426 models.

What does a RF900 fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 27% of all defects recorded against failed RF900 tests.

What is the best year of RF900 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1999-registered examples do best (87.0%) and 1994 worst (77.2%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a RF900 last?

The median RF900 shows 30,110 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 67.3% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.