Model report · 2005–2025
SUZUKI GN 125 X
124cc
Petrol
Class 1
66.7%
first-time pass rate
18.1%
failed outright
15,200
median miles at test
105
MOT tests, 2005–2025
What fails on a GN 125 X
failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
16 | 27.6 |
| steering and suspension |
|
12 | 20.7 |
| drive system |
|
11 | 19 |
| brakes |
|
9 | 15.5 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
4 | 6.9 |
| body and structure |
|
2 | 3.4 |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
2 | 3.4 |
| fuel and exhaust |
|
1 | 1.7 |
| Items Not Tested |
|
1 | 1.7 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
same type, similar capacity, high test volume
On first-time pass rate the GN 125 X beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YBR 125, HONDA CG125, HONDA CBF125).
YAMAHA
YBR 125
71.0% pass · 125k tests
HONDA
CG125
72.2% pass · 89.3k tests
HONDA
CBF125
73.3% pass · 84.4k tests
GILERA
RUNNER
70.8% pass · 69.9k tests
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the GN 125 X.
Pass rate by registration year
how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date
Best year to buy used: 1999 (64.9% pass). Weakest: 1999 (64.9%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.