BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

SUZUKI EN 125

124cc Petrol Class 1
#5047 of 5426 overall #670 of 680 SUZUKIs #537 of 734 commuter bikes
64.2%
first-time pass rate
21.4%
failed outright
11,824
median miles at test
5,187
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2007–2025

The EN 125's first-time pass rate has fallen 4.3 points since 2007, 71.3% to 67.0%.

58%66%74%2007: 71.3% pass (80 tests)2008: 67.3% pass (281 tests)2009: 64.9% pass (402 tests)2010: 64.1% pass (496 tests)2011: 64.6% pass (509 tests)2012: 65.0% pass (483 tests)2013: 63.8% pass (436 tests)2014: 63.3% pass (403 tests)2015: 61.3% pass (351 tests)2016: 61.8% pass (306 tests)2017: 61.9% pass (260 tests)2018: 63.7% pass (179 tests)2019: 65.9% pass (185 tests)2020: 62.8% pass (145 tests)2021: 60.7% pass (168 tests)2022: 61.7% pass (154 tests)2023: 68.8% pass (141 tests)2024: 68.0% pass (97 tests)2025: 67.0% pass (106 tests)20072025

Pass rate by mileage

how the EN 125's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage EN 125 passes first time 72.3% of the time; by 50k that's 58.1%.

47%62%77%0k: 72.3% pass (2,197 tests)10k: 59.7% pass (1,724 tests)20k: 56.2% pass (786 tests)30k: 50.8% pass (264 tests)40k: 60.5% pass (124 tests)50k: 58.1% pass (43 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a EN 125

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
1,017 30.9 2.8×
brakes
511 15.5 1.6×
drive system
428 13 7.8×
steering and suspension
397 12.1 1.9×
lamps and reflectors
292 8.9 2.1×
tyres and wheels
206 6.3 1.7×
structure and attachments
195 5.9 3.5×
body and structure
114 3.5 3.6×
suspension
73 2.2 1.6×
fuel and exhaust
56 1.7 1.3×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the EN 125 beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YBR 125, HONDA CG125, HONDA CBF125).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the EN 125.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2009 (72.7% pass). Weakest: 2005 (61.7%).

60%67%75%2004: 65.3% pass (883 tests)2005: 61.7% pass (1,930 tests)2006: 64.7% pass (1,115 tests)2007: 66.1% pass (832 tests)2008: 67.1% pass (295 tests)2009: 72.7% pass (77 tests)200420072009

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI EN 125 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI EN 125 reliable?

The SUZUKI EN 125 is less reliable than average for its class: 64.2% of its 5,187 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #5047 of 5426 models.

What does a EN 125 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 31% of all defects recorded against failed EN 125 tests.

What is the best year of EN 125 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2009-registered examples do best (72.7%) and 2005 worst (61.7%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a EN 125 last?

The median EN 125 shows 11,824 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 58.1% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.