BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

SUZUKI EN

124cc Petrol Class 1
#4958 of 5426 overall #664 of 680 SUZUKIs #495 of 734 commuter bikes
66.1%
first-time pass rate
20.1%
failed outright
10,173
median miles at test
557
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2017–2025

The EN's first-time pass rate has held steady since 2017 (75.6% → 75.6%).

47%66%84%2017: 75.6% pass (41 tests)2018: 75.0% pass (44 tests)2019: 53.3% pass (45 tests)2020: 71.4% pass (35 tests)2021: 58.0% pass (50 tests)2022: 69.6% pass (46 tests)2023: 54.3% pass (46 tests)2024: 78.1% pass (32 tests)2025: 75.6% pass (41 tests)20172025

Pass rate by mileage

how the EN's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage EN passes first time 75.7% of the time; by 20k that's 56.3%.

52%66%80%0k: 75.7% pass (272 tests)10k: 57.9% pass (171 tests)20k: 56.3% pass (71 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a EN

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lamps and reflectors
82 28.6 5.3×
brakes
50 17.4 1.3×
lighting and signalling
40 13.9 1.0×
structure and attachments
33 11.5 7.1×
drive system
19 6.6 4.0×
suspension
17 5.9 3.4×
steering
15 5.2 6.5×
tyres
13 4.5 3.4×
steering and suspension
11 3.8 0.6×
tyres and wheels
7 2.4 0.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the EN beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YBR 125, HONDA CG125, HONDA CBF125).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the EN.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2015 (72.7% pass). Weakest: 2007 (57.3%).

54%65%76%2005: 59.6% pass (94 tests)2006: 68.8% pass (64 tests)2007: 57.3% pass (75 tests)2014: 64.2% pass (106 tests)2015: 72.7% pass (99 tests)200520072015

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI EN FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI EN reliable?

The SUZUKI EN is less reliable than average for its class: 66.1% of its 557 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #4958 of 5426 models.

What does a EN fail its MOT on most?

lamps and reflectors — 29% of all defects recorded against failed EN tests.

What is the best year of EN to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2015-registered examples do best (72.7%) and 2007 worst (57.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a EN last?

The median EN shows 10,173 miles at test, and examples around 20k miles still pass 56.3% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.