SUKIDA SK 50 QT-11A DRAGONFLY
What fails on a SK 50 QT-11A DRAGONFLY
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
41 | 39.4 |
| brakes |
|
32 | 30.8 |
| steering and suspension |
|
14 | 13.5 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
8 | 7.7 |
| body and structure |
|
3 | 2.9 |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
2 | 1.9 |
| reg plates and vin |
|
1 | 1 |
| steering |
|
1 | 1 |
| tyres |
|
1 | 1 |
| fuel and exhaust |
|
1 | 1 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the SK 50 QT-11A DRAGONFLY beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (PEUGEOT SPEEDFIGHT, PIAGGIO ZIP, PIAGGIO NRG).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the SK 50 QT-11A DRAGONFLY.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2006 (67.9% pass). Weakest: 2007 (62.7%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.