BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

PIAGGIO X9 500

459cc Petrol Class 2
79.5%
first-time pass rate
15.6%
failed outright
13,812
median miles at test
886
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2018

The X9 500's first-time pass rate has fallen 3.3 points since 2006, 83.9% to 80.6%.

67%79%90%2006: 83.9% pass (62 tests)2007: 79.4% pass (68 tests)2008: 80.0% pass (85 tests)2009: 79.5% pass (78 tests)2010: 86.4% pass (66 tests)2011: 75.0% pass (76 tests)2012: 77.5% pass (71 tests)2013: 71.2% pass (59 tests)2014: 72.9% pass (48 tests)2015: 71.1% pass (45 tests)2016: 80.4% pass (46 tests)2017: 82.9% pass (41 tests)2018: 80.6% pass (31 tests)20062018

Pass rate by mileage

how the X9 500's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage X9 500 passes first time 86.1% of the time; by 30k that's 75.0%.

73%81%88%0k: 86.1% pass (310 tests)10k: 78.3% pass (323 tests)20k: 75.7% pass (152 tests)30k: 75.0% pass (72 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a X9 500

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
93 31.2 1.9×
brakes
84 28.2 1.5×
steering and suspension
60 20.1 1.7×
tyres and wheels
33 11.1 1.6×
lamps and reflectors
8 2.7 0.4×
fuel and exhaust
8 2.7 1.2×
suspension
5 1.7 0.8×
tyres
4 1.3 0.5×
steering
2 0.7 0.5×
reg plates and vin
1 0.3 0.2×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the X9 500 beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ER5, YAMAHA XV535, SUZUKI GS500).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the X9 500.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2006 (84.5% pass). Weakest: 2008 (74.1%).

72%79%87%2002: 75.8% pass (186 tests)2003: 79.8% pass (99 tests)2004: 75.9% pass (83 tests)2005: 82.0% pass (245 tests)2006: 84.5% pass (116 tests)2007: 81.9% pass (72 tests)2008: 74.1% pass (81 tests)200220052008

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

PIAGGIO X9 500 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the PIAGGIO X9 500 reliable?

The PIAGGIO X9 500 is less reliable than average for its class: 79.5% of its 886 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3686 of 5426 models.

What does a X9 500 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 31% of all defects recorded against failed X9 500 tests.

What is the best year of X9 500 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2006-registered examples do best (84.5%) and 2008 worst (74.1%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a X9 500 last?

The median X9 500 shows 13,812 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 75.0% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.