BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ KTM/250 EXC-F 12
Model report · 2005–2025

KTM 250 EXC-F 12

250cc Petrol Class 2
#4406 of 5426 overall #213 of 230 KTMs #2702 of 2787 other bikes
73.9%
first-time pass rate
11.6%
failed outright
2,565
median miles at test
249
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2015–2017

The 250 EXC-F 12's first-time pass rate has fallen 11.5 points since 2015, 73.3% to 61.8%.

58%69%80%2015: 73.3% pass (30 tests)2016: 76.5% pass (34 tests)2017: 61.8% pass (34 tests)20152017

What fails on a 250 EXC-F 12

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects
lighting and signalling
16 23.2
suspension
15 21.7
lamps and reflectors
13 18.8
steering and suspension
6 8.7
drive system
4 5.8
tyres
4 5.8
brakes
4 5.8
tyres and wheels
3 4.3
Identification of the vehicle
2 2.9
audible warning (Horn)
2 2.9

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the 250 EXC-F 12 beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 250 EXC-F 12.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2011 (77.5% pass). Weakest: 2012 (71.5%).

70%75%79%2011: 77.5% pass (111 tests)2012: 71.5% pass (130 tests)20112012

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.