BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ KTM/250 EXC 13
Model report · 2005–2025

KTM 250 EXC 13

249cc Petrol Class 2
#3006 of 5426 overall #122 of 230 KTMs #1903 of 2787 other bikes
82.8%
first-time pass rate
8.3%
failed outright
2,722
median miles at test
337
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2016–2021

The 250 EXC 13's first-time pass rate has risen 2.6 points since 2016, 84.1% to 86.7%.

83%85%88%2016: 84.1% pass (69 tests)2017: 86.8% pass (38 tests)2021: 86.7% pass (30 tests)20162021

What fails on a 250 EXC 13

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects
lamps and reflectors
22 34.4
suspension
12 18.8
audible warning (Horn)
5 7.8
brakes
5 7.8
steering and suspension
5 7.8
lighting and signalling
5 7.8
Identification of the vehicle
4 6.2
tyres and wheels
3 4.7
reg plates and vin
2 3.1
structure and attachments
1 1.6

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the 250 EXC 13 beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 250 EXC 13.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2013 (84.8% pass). Weakest: 2012 (80.6%).

80%83%86%2012: 80.6% pass (170 tests)2013: 84.8% pass (165 tests)20122013

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.