KTM 250 EXC 12
Pass rate over time
The 250 EXC 12's first-time pass rate has fallen 5.3 points since 2015, 68.9% to 63.6%.
What fails on a 250 EXC 12
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lamps and reflectors |
|
28 | 21.9 |
| lighting and signalling |
|
24 | 18.8 |
| suspension |
|
15 | 11.7 |
| audible warning (Horn) |
|
12 | 9.4 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
10 | 7.8 |
| steering and suspension |
|
10 | 7.8 |
| Identification of the vehicle |
|
9 | 7 |
| brakes |
|
8 | 6.2 |
| reg plates and vin |
|
7 | 5.5 |
| tyres |
|
5 | 3.9 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the 250 EXC 12 beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 250 EXC 12.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2011 (76.1% pass). Weakest: 2012 (73.4%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.