BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

KAWASAKI KDX200

198cc Petrol Class 1
77.0%
first-time pass rate
14.1%
failed outright
3,380
median miles at test
936
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2021

The KDX200's first-time pass rate has risen 5.0 points since 2006, 78.3% to 83.3%.

60%75%90%2006: 78.3% pass (69 tests)2007: 76.2% pass (63 tests)2008: 74.6% pass (67 tests)2009: 70.1% pass (67 tests)2010: 65.0% pass (60 tests)2011: 71.0% pass (62 tests)2012: 74.0% pass (50 tests)2013: 74.6% pass (63 tests)2014: 70.8% pass (65 tests)2015: 76.8% pass (56 tests)2016: 82.6% pass (46 tests)2017: 81.0% pass (42 tests)2020: 85.3% pass (34 tests)2021: 83.3% pass (36 tests)20062021

Pass rate by mileage

how the KDX200's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage KDX200 passes first time 77.5% of the time; by 20k that's 86.0%.

71%80%89%0k: 77.5% pass (507 tests)10k: 73.1% pass (145 tests)20k: 86.0% pass (43 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a KDX200

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
153 34.7 2.0×
tyres and wheels
73 16.6 2.7×
steering and suspension
65 14.7 1.4×
brakes
63 14.3 1.0×
reg plates and vin
27 6.1 4.1×
drive system
21 4.8 1.9×
lamps and reflectors
18 4.1 0.5×
tyres
8 1.8 0.8×
audible warning (Horn)
7 1.6 4.1×
body and structure
6 1.4 1.1×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the KDX200 beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the KDX200.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1996 (86.2% pass). Weakest: 1991 (70.8%).

68%79%89%1989: 74.5% pass (165 tests)1990: 76.3% pass (160 tests)1991: 70.8% pass (72 tests)1994: 76.0% pass (50 tests)1996: 86.2% pass (58 tests)1997: 74.1% pass (54 tests)1998: 76.4% pass (89 tests)198919941998

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KAWASAKI KDX200 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KAWASAKI KDX200 reliable?

The KAWASAKI KDX200 is more reliable than average for its class: 77.0% of its 936 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #4065 of 5426 models.

What does a KDX200 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 35% of all defects recorded against failed KDX200 tests.

What is the best year of KDX200 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1996-registered examples do best (86.2%) and 1991 worst (70.8%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a KDX200 last?

The median KDX200 shows 3,380 miles at test, and examples around 20k miles still pass 86.0% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.