BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

KAWASAKI AR125

123cc Petrol Class 1
66.8%
first-time pass rate
25.6%
failed outright
17,317
median miles at test
1,011
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2019

The AR125's first-time pass rate has risen 10.1 points since 2006, 63.2% to 73.3%.

36%61%87%2006: 63.2% pass (133 tests)2007: 66.7% pass (96 tests)2008: 55.6% pass (90 tests)2009: 44.0% pass (75 tests)2010: 60.9% pass (69 tests)2011: 59.7% pass (62 tests)2012: 74.2% pass (66 tests)2013: 64.0% pass (50 tests)2014: 65.1% pass (43 tests)2015: 71.4% pass (35 tests)2016: 78.0% pass (41 tests)2017: 69.2% pass (39 tests)2019: 73.3% pass (30 tests)20062019

Pass rate by mileage

how the AR125's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage AR125 passes first time 80.1% of the time; by 30k that's 54.4%.

49%67%85%0k: 80.1% pass (231 tests)10k: 63.4% pass (380 tests)20k: 63.6% pass (283 tests)30k: 54.4% pass (79 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a AR125

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
337 32.7 4.0×
steering and suspension
244 23.6 4.5×
brakes
149 14.4 2.4×
drive system
77 7.5 7.8×
tyres and wheels
76 7.4 2.9×
body and structure
70 6.8 9.7×
fuel and exhaust
42 4.1 4.7×
lamps and reflectors
17 1.6 0.6×
structure and attachments
10 1 0.9×
reg plates and vin
10 1 1.6×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the AR125 beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YBR 125, HONDA CG125, HONDA CBF125).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the AR125.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1992 (78.5% pass). Weakest: 1988 (59.3%).

55%69%82%1986: 69.7% pass (89 tests)1987: 66.7% pass (84 tests)1988: 59.3% pass (123 tests)1989: 63.5% pass (178 tests)1990: 67.3% pass (165 tests)1991: 71.0% pass (62 tests)1992: 78.5% pass (65 tests)1994: 70.7% pass (75 tests)198619901994

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KAWASAKI AR125 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KAWASAKI AR125 reliable?

The KAWASAKI AR125 is less reliable than average for its class: 66.8% of its 1,011 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #4914 of 5426 models.

What does a AR125 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 33% of all defects recorded against failed AR125 tests.

What is the best year of AR125 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1992-registered examples do best (78.5%) and 1988 worst (59.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a AR125 last?

The median AR125 shows 17,317 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 54.4% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.