BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

HONDA XLR250

249cc Petrol Class 2
78.4%
first-time pass rate
12.4%
failed outright
17,726
median miles at test
912
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2021

The XLR250's first-time pass rate has held steady since 2006 (79.7% → 80.6%).

62%77%92%2006: 79.7% pass (79 tests)2007: 78.8% pass (66 tests)2008: 72.7% pass (66 tests)2009: 77.4% pass (62 tests)2010: 71.7% pass (60 tests)2011: 67.2% pass (58 tests)2012: 78.8% pass (52 tests)2013: 72.7% pass (55 tests)2014: 78.9% pass (57 tests)2015: 85.1% pass (47 tests)2016: 86.7% pass (45 tests)2017: 83.3% pass (42 tests)2021: 80.6% pass (36 tests)20062021

Pass rate by mileage

how the XLR250's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage XLR250 passes first time 83.0% of the time; by 40k that's 87.5%.

71%81%90%0k: 83.0% pass (235 tests)10k: 79.0% pass (291 tests)20k: 74.1% pass (228 tests)30k: 74.2% pass (93 tests)40k: 87.5% pass (32 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a XLR250

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
81 27.5 1.3×
brakes
68 23.1 1.2×
steering and suspension
50 16.9 1.4×
reg plates and vin
23 7.8 3.3×
tyres and wheels
21 7.1 1.0×
drive system
17 5.8 1.7×
lamps and reflectors
16 5.4 0.6×
fuel and exhaust
7 2.4 0.7×
driving controls
7 2.4 3.3×
structure and attachments
5 1.7 0.8×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the XLR250 beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the XLR250.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1988 (83.1% pass). Weakest: 1993 (73.3%).

71%78%85%1987: 79.5% pass (117 tests)1988: 83.1% pass (59 tests)1990: 75.5% pass (94 tests)1991: 80.8% pass (167 tests)1992: 77.9% pass (113 tests)1993: 73.3% pass (90 tests)198719911993

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HONDA XLR250 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HONDA XLR250 reliable?

The HONDA XLR250 is less reliable than average for its class: 78.4% of its 912 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3854 of 5426 models.

What does a XLR250 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 27% of all defects recorded against failed XLR250 tests.

What is the best year of XLR250 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1988-registered examples do best (83.1%) and 1993 worst (73.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a XLR250 last?

The median XLR250 shows 17,726 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 87.5% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.