HONDA NX 400
Pass rate by mileage
A low-mileage NX 400 passes first time 84.7% of the time; by 20k that's 80.0%.
First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.
What fails on a NX 400
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
6 | 31.6 |
| steering and suspension |
|
4 | 21.1 |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
3 | 15.8 |
| drive system |
|
2 | 10.5 |
| brakes |
|
2 | 10.5 |
| audible warning (Horn) |
|
1 | 5.3 |
| suspension |
|
1 | 5.3 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the NX 400 beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ER5, SUZUKI GS500, SUZUKI AN400).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the NX 400.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2006 (76.5% pass). Weakest: 2006 (76.5%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.