BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

HONDA CN250

249cc Petrol Class 2
82.1%
first-time pass rate
12.7%
failed outright
23,406
median miles at test
1,308
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The CN250's first-time pass rate has risen 4.7 points since 2005, 82.1% to 86.8%.

63%78%92%2005: 82.1% pass (39 tests)2006: 87.1% pass (116 tests)2007: 80.7% pass (114 tests)2008: 86.9% pass (99 tests)2009: 78.6% pass (98 tests)2010: 83.3% pass (84 tests)2011: 74.4% pass (90 tests)2012: 68.1% pass (69 tests)2013: 77.6% pass (67 tests)2014: 83.8% pass (68 tests)2015: 81.4% pass (59 tests)2016: 82.7% pass (52 tests)2017: 86.0% pass (50 tests)2018: 83.9% pass (31 tests)2019: 83.3% pass (36 tests)2021: 85.7% pass (49 tests)2022: 87.5% pass (48 tests)2023: 80.5% pass (41 tests)2024: 87.1% pass (31 tests)2025: 86.8% pass (38 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the CN250's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage CN250 passes first time 86.7% of the time; by 50k that's 72.7%.

70%80%90%0k: 86.7% pass (158 tests)10k: 84.0% pass (357 tests)20k: 83.3% pass (371 tests)30k: 77.2% pass (206 tests)40k: 79.3% pass (116 tests)50k: 72.7% pass (55 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a CN250

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
78 23.3 1.1×
tyres and wheels
66 19.7 2.1×
lighting and signalling
54 16.1 0.8×
fuel and exhaust
49 14.6 4.5×
steering and suspension
33 9.9 0.6×
lamps and reflectors
20 6 0.7×
reg plates and vin
13 3.9 1.5×
tyres
12 3.6 1.1×
structure and attachments
5 1.5 0.4×
body and structure
5 1.5 0.8×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the CN250 beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CN250.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1992 (90.1% pass). Weakest: 1991 (79.9%).

78%85%92%1990: 81.3% pass (753 tests)1991: 79.9% pass (219 tests)1992: 90.1% pass (111 tests)199019911992

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HONDA CN250 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HONDA CN250 reliable?

The HONDA CN250 is less reliable than average for its class: 82.1% of its 1,308 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3165 of 5426 models.

What does a CN250 fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 23% of all defects recorded against failed CN250 tests.

What is the best year of CN250 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1992-registered examples do best (90.1%) and 1991 worst (79.9%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a CN250 last?

The median CN250 shows 23,406 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 72.7% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.