BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

HONDA CM250

248cc Petrol Class 2
77.4%
first-time pass rate
13.6%
failed outright
25,632
median miles at test
1,515
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2022

The CM250's first-time pass rate has risen 21.0 points since 2005, 75.8% to 96.8%.

54%77%100%2005: 75.8% pass (33 tests)2006: 81.0% pass (137 tests)2007: 72.0% pass (125 tests)2008: 68.6% pass (118 tests)2009: 79.0% pass (105 tests)2010: 72.4% pass (105 tests)2011: 85.4% pass (96 tests)2012: 62.9% pass (97 tests)2013: 74.2% pass (97 tests)2014: 77.3% pass (88 tests)2015: 85.1% pass (87 tests)2016: 77.8% pass (72 tests)2017: 74.2% pass (66 tests)2018: 80.0% pass (60 tests)2019: 82.6% pass (46 tests)2020: 77.4% pass (53 tests)2021: 89.3% pass (56 tests)2022: 96.8% pass (31 tests)20052022

Pass rate by mileage

how the CM250's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage CM250 passes first time 78.9% of the time; by 50k that's 72.4%.

70%78%86%0k: 78.9% pass (142 tests)10k: 83.7% pass (337 tests)20k: 76.4% pass (470 tests)30k: 72.2% pass (302 tests)40k: 77.7% pass (139 tests)50k: 72.4% pass (76 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a CM250

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
151 28.1 1.6×
steering and suspension
109 20.3 1.6×
brakes
95 17.7 1.0×
tyres and wheels
60 11.2 1.7×
drive system
44 8.2 3.0×
fuel and exhaust
26 4.8 1.9×
body and structure
15 2.8 1.7×
driving controls
13 2.4 3.7×
lamps and reflectors
13 2.4 0.3×
reg plates and vin
12 2.2 1.3×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the CM250 beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CM250.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1983 (76.9% pass). Weakest: 1981 (75.5%).

75%76%78%1981: 75.5% pass (636 tests)1982: 76.3% pass (401 tests)1983: 76.9% pass (208 tests)198119821983

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HONDA CM250 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HONDA CM250 reliable?

The HONDA CM250 is less reliable than average for its class: 77.4% of its 1,515 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3997 of 5426 models.

What does a CM250 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 28% of all defects recorded against failed CM250 tests.

What is the best year of CM250 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1983-registered examples do best (76.9%) and 1981 worst (75.5%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a CM250 last?

The median CM250 shows 25,632 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 72.4% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.