BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ HONDA/CBF 1000 AT-9
Model report · 2005–2025

HONDA CBF 1000 AT-9

998cc Petrol Class 2
88.2%
first-time pass rate
6.7%
failed outright
17,693
median miles at test
2,778
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2012–2025

The CBF 1000 AT-9's first-time pass rate has risen 4.9 points since 2012, 84.4% to 89.3%.

77%87%97%2012: 84.4% pass (205 tests)2013: 88.6% pass (245 tests)2014: 88.6% pass (254 tests)2015: 90.9% pass (253 tests)2016: 90.5% pass (241 tests)2017: 87.1% pass (232 tests)2018: 87.9% pass (173 tests)2019: 88.8% pass (179 tests)2020: 88.0% pass (142 tests)2021: 87.3% pass (204 tests)2022: 93.4% pass (181 tests)2023: 86.3% pass (182 tests)2024: 80.5% pass (149 tests)2025: 89.3% pass (131 tests)20122025

Pass rate by mileage

how the CBF 1000 AT-9's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage CBF 1000 AT-9 passes first time 93.4% of the time; by 50k that's 73.7%.

70%84%97%0k: 93.4% pass (711 tests)10k: 87.5% pass (841 tests)20k: 86.2% pass (595 tests)30k: 88.8% pass (366 tests)40k: 81.7% pass (169 tests)50k: 73.7% pass (57 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a CBF 1000 AT-9

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
78 27.4 0.6×
lamps and reflectors
39 13.7 0.8×
lighting and signalling
35 12.3 0.3×
tyres
27 9.5 1.1×
tyres and wheels
26 9.1 0.5×
suspension
26 9.1 1.2×
steering and suspension
21 7.4 0.2×
steering
15 5.3 1.0×
structure and attachments
15 5.3 0.6×
audible warning (Horn)
3 1.1 0.6×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the CBF 1000 AT-9 beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (BMW R1200, BMW R1150, TRIUMPH SPRINT).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CBF 1000 AT-9.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2008 (90.8% pass). Weakest: 2011 (82.4%).

81%87%92%2008: 90.8% pass (65 tests)2009: 88.4% pass (2,100 tests)2010: 87.7% pass (528 tests)2011: 82.4% pass (85 tests)200820102011

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HONDA CBF 1000 AT-9 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HONDA CBF 1000 AT-9 reliable?

The HONDA CBF 1000 AT-9 is more reliable than average for its class: 88.2% of its 2,778 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1541 of 5426 models.

What does a CBF 1000 AT-9 fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 27% of all defects recorded against failed CBF 1000 AT-9 tests.

What is the best year of CBF 1000 AT-9 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2008-registered examples do best (90.8%) and 2011 worst (82.4%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a CBF 1000 AT-9 last?

The median CBF 1000 AT-9 shows 17,693 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 73.7% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.