BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ HONDA/CB900F-2 HORNET
Model report · 2005–2025

HONDA CB900F-2 HORNET

919cc Petrol Class 2
85.4%
first-time pass rate
5.2%
failed outright
13,729
median miles at test
673
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2017

The CB900F-2 HORNET's first-time pass rate has risen 6.4 points since 2006, 85.7% to 92.1%.

77%86%95%2006: 85.7% pass (56 tests)2007: 85.3% pass (68 tests)2008: 89.9% pass (69 tests)2009: 88.0% pass (50 tests)2010: 83.3% pass (30 tests)2011: 80.0% pass (30 tests)2013: 84.4% pass (32 tests)2015: 84.4% pass (32 tests)2016: 84.4% pass (32 tests)2017: 92.1% pass (38 tests)20062017

Pass rate by mileage

how the CB900F-2 HORNET's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage CB900F-2 HORNET passes first time 89.1% of the time; by 30k that's 80.6%.

77%84%91%0k: 89.1% pass (230 tests)10k: 86.5% pass (252 tests)20k: 79.4% pass (131 tests)30k: 80.6% pass (31 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a CB900F-2 HORNET

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
12 22.2 0.4×
steering and suspension
10 18.5 0.4×
tyres and wheels
10 18.5 0.6×
brakes
9 16.7 0.3×
drive system
3 5.6 0.6×
suspension
3 5.6 0.6×
audible warning (Horn)
2 3.7 1.6×
fuel and exhaust
2 3.7 0.2×
reg plates and vin
2 3.7 0.5×
driving controls
1 1.9 0.6×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the CB900F-2 HORNET beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (TRIUMPH SPEED TRIPLE, TRIUMPH STREET TRIPLE, APRILIA TUONO).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CB900F-2 HORNET.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2004 (88.3% pass). Weakest: 2003 (85.8%).

85%87%89%2002: 86.9% pass (245 tests)2003: 85.8% pass (232 tests)2004: 88.3% pass (128 tests)200220032004

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HONDA CB900F-2 HORNET FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HONDA CB900F-2 HORNET reliable?

The HONDA CB900F-2 HORNET is about average for its class: 85.4% of its 673 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #2384 of 5426 models.

What does a CB900F-2 HORNET fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 22% of all defects recorded against failed CB900F-2 HORNET tests.

What is the best year of CB900F-2 HORNET to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2004-registered examples do best (88.3%) and 2003 worst (85.8%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a CB900F-2 HORNET last?

The median CB900F-2 HORNET shows 13,729 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 80.6% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.