BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
81.8%
first-time pass rate
10.5%
failed outright
12,424
median miles at test
1,272
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2021

The XLH1000's first-time pass rate has held steady since 2006 (79.6% → 80.0%).

73%81%88%2006: 79.6% pass (113 tests)2007: 83.7% pass (98 tests)2008: 80.5% pass (82 tests)2009: 78.6% pass (84 tests)2010: 75.7% pass (74 tests)2011: 81.0% pass (79 tests)2012: 77.5% pass (71 tests)2013: 82.9% pass (82 tests)2014: 85.1% pass (87 tests)2015: 83.1% pass (89 tests)2016: 85.7% pass (77 tests)2017: 81.2% pass (101 tests)2018: 85.1% pass (47 tests)2019: 78.0% pass (41 tests)2021: 80.0% pass (45 tests)20062021

Pass rate by mileage

how the XLH1000's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage XLH1000 passes first time 81.7% of the time; by 40k that's 83.0%.

75%82%88%0k: 81.7% pass (520 tests)10k: 77.2% pass (246 tests)20k: 86.3% pass (139 tests)30k: 80.2% pass (106 tests)40k: 83.0% pass (47 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a XLH1000

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
98 27.9 1.2×
brakes
86 24.5 1.1×
steering and suspension
72 20.5 1.4×
tyres and wheels
21 6 0.8×
body and structure
19 5.4 2.3×
reg plates and vin
16 4.6 1.9×
fuel and exhaust
14 4 1.3×
lamps and reflectors
12 3.4 0.4×
drive system
7 2 0.8×
Identification of the vehicle
6 1.7 2.0×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the XLH1000 beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (TRIUMPH BONNEVILLE, TRIUMPH THUNDERBIRD, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XLH 883).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the XLH1000.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1982 (92.7% pass). Weakest: 1983 (65.5%).

60%79%98%1971: 75.0% pass (68 tests)1974: 89.1% pass (55 tests)1975: 82.4% pass (51 tests)1976: 73.3% pass (60 tests)1978: 80.0% pass (50 tests)1979: 84.2% pass (101 tests)1980: 82.3% pass (164 tests)1981: 77.4% pass (190 tests)1982: 92.7% pass (124 tests)1983: 65.5% pass (55 tests)1984: 85.6% pass (118 tests)197119791984

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HARLEY-DAVIDSON XLH1000 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HARLEY-DAVIDSON XLH1000 reliable?

The HARLEY-DAVIDSON XLH1000 is less reliable than average for its class: 81.8% of its 1,272 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3219 of 5426 models.

What does a XLH1000 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 28% of all defects recorded against failed XLH1000 tests.

What is the best year of XLH1000 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1982-registered examples do best (92.7%) and 1983 worst (65.5%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a XLH1000 last?

The median XLH1000 shows 12,424 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 83.0% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.