BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

GENERIC XOR

50cc Petrol Class 1
66.7%
first-time pass rate
24.0%
failed outright
8,332
median miles at test
1,090
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2010–2021

The XOR's first-time pass rate has risen 6.4 points since 2010, 68.6% to 75.0%.

58%70%81%2010: 68.6% pass (35 tests)2011: 65.6% pass (131 tests)2012: 64.6% pass (161 tests)2013: 64.8% pass (145 tests)2014: 68.3% pass (167 tests)2015: 68.0% pass (122 tests)2016: 64.8% pass (88 tests)2017: 61.9% pass (63 tests)2018: 65.1% pass (43 tests)2019: 77.4% pass (31 tests)2021: 75.0% pass (32 tests)20102021

Pass rate by mileage

how the XOR's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage XOR passes first time 69.9% of the time; by 20k that's 55.7%.

53%63%73%0k: 69.9% pass (672 tests)10k: 62.3% pass (342 tests)20k: 55.7% pass (61 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a XOR

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
217 28.9 2.8×
steering and suspension
191 25.5 3.8×
brakes
145 19.3 2.2×
tyres and wheels
70 9.3 2.6×
fuel and exhaust
46 6.1 4.0×
lamps and reflectors
26 3.5 1.0×
body and structure
18 2.4 2.5×
suspension
15 2 1.7×
reg plates and vin
11 1.5 1.6×
structure and attachments
11 1.5 0.9×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the XOR beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (PEUGEOT SPEEDFIGHT, PIAGGIO ZIP, PIAGGIO NRG).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the XOR.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2010 (70.1% pass). Weakest: 2007 (63.2%).

62%67%71%2007: 63.2% pass (125 tests)2008: 66.4% pass (381 tests)2009: 65.1% pass (212 tests)2010: 70.1% pass (154 tests)2011: 66.9% pass (145 tests)200720092011

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

GENERIC XOR FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the GENERIC XOR reliable?

The GENERIC XOR is less reliable than average for its class: 66.7% of its 1,090 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #4923 of 5426 models.

What does a XOR fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 29% of all defects recorded against failed XOR tests.

What is the best year of XOR to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2010-registered examples do best (70.1%) and 2007 worst (63.2%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a XOR last?

The median XOR shows 8,332 miles at test, and examples around 20k miles still pass 55.7% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.