BAOTIAN BT 49 QT-12D REBEL
What fails on a BT 49 QT-12D REBEL
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
51 | 34.7 |
| brakes |
|
32 | 21.8 |
| steering and suspension |
|
25 | 17 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
11 | 7.5 |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
10 | 6.8 |
| body and structure |
|
6 | 4.1 |
| fuel and exhaust |
|
5 | 3.4 |
| suspension |
|
4 | 2.7 |
| steering |
|
2 | 1.4 |
| structure and attachments |
|
1 | 0.7 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the BT 49 QT-12D REBEL beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (PEUGEOT SPEEDFIGHT, PIAGGIO ZIP, PIAGGIO NRG).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the BT 49 QT-12D REBEL.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2011 (74.0% pass). Weakest: 2008 (62.0%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.