BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

YAMAHA XT350

346cc Petrol Class 2
77.2%
first-time pass rate
13.0%
failed outright
20,268
median miles at test
4,921
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The XT350's first-time pass rate has risen 6.6 points since 2005, 78.1% to 84.7%.

67%80%93%2005: 78.1% pass (96 tests)2006: 75.0% pass (412 tests)2007: 77.9% pass (366 tests)2008: 71.2% pass (378 tests)2009: 74.0% pass (335 tests)2010: 74.7% pass (304 tests)2011: 72.0% pass (311 tests)2012: 75.1% pass (277 tests)2013: 76.5% pass (260 tests)2014: 71.2% pass (274 tests)2015: 77.0% pass (230 tests)2016: 78.8% pass (226 tests)2017: 78.1% pass (224 tests)2018: 82.5% pass (171 tests)2019: 82.6% pass (138 tests)2020: 81.6% pass (147 tests)2021: 82.5% pass (194 tests)2022: 88.5% pass (165 tests)2023: 84.0% pass (163 tests)2024: 84.9% pass (126 tests)2025: 84.7% pass (124 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the XT350's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage XT350 passes first time 80.6% of the time; by 50k that's 77.8%.

70%76%82%0k: 80.6% pass (935 tests)10k: 76.9% pass (1,457 tests)20k: 78.1% pass (1,264 tests)30k: 71.5% pass (712 tests)40k: 76.6% pass (239 tests)50k: 77.8% pass (153 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a XT350

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
720 41 1.8×
steering and suspension
294 16.8 1.4×
brakes
234 13.3 0.9×
tyres and wheels
172 9.8 1.3×
drive system
105 6 2.0×
lamps and reflectors
78 4.4 0.6×
reg plates and vin
49 2.8 1.5×
fuel and exhaust
39 2.2 1.0×
suspension
37 2.1 0.9×
structure and attachments
26 1.5 0.7×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the XT350 beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (SUZUKI AN400, SUZUKI DR-Z400S, YAMAHA RD350).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the XT350.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1996 (82.2% pass). Weakest: 1992 (72.2%).

70%77%84%1971: 78.9% pass (95 tests)1985: 78.5% pass (284 tests)1986: 76.0% pass (429 tests)1987: 76.1% pass (418 tests)1988: 75.8% pass (462 tests)1989: 74.4% pass (511 tests)1990: 75.3% pass (518 tests)1991: 79.8% pass (425 tests)1992: 72.2% pass (371 tests)1993: 79.8% pass (436 tests)1994: 76.3% pass (236 tests)1995: 82.0% pass (256 tests)1996: 82.2% pass (292 tests)1997: 80.5% pass (77 tests)197119911997

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

YAMAHA XT350 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the YAMAHA XT350 reliable?

The YAMAHA XT350 is less reliable than average for its class: 77.2% of its 4,921 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #4032 of 5426 models.

What does a XT350 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 41% of all defects recorded against failed XT350 tests.

What is the best year of XT350 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1996-registered examples do best (82.2%) and 1992 worst (72.2%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a XT350 last?

The median XT350 shows 20,268 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 77.8% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.