BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

SUZUKI DR

349cc Petrol Class 2
80.1%
first-time pass rate
12.4%
failed outright
15,852
median miles at test
2,112
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The DR's first-time pass rate has fallen 4.7 points since 2006, 86.4% to 81.7%.

71%83%96%2006: 86.4% pass (110 tests)2007: 79.5% pass (117 tests)2008: 77.3% pass (110 tests)2009: 77.0% pass (100 tests)2010: 79.5% pass (112 tests)2011: 75.0% pass (128 tests)2012: 78.5% pass (135 tests)2013: 77.1% pass (140 tests)2014: 81.9% pass (127 tests)2015: 76.7% pass (116 tests)2016: 80.6% pass (103 tests)2017: 75.5% pass (98 tests)2018: 85.4% pass (82 tests)2019: 75.3% pass (93 tests)2020: 82.7% pass (81 tests)2021: 84.7% pass (98 tests)2022: 80.4% pass (102 tests)2023: 91.4% pass (93 tests)2024: 80.9% pass (68 tests)2025: 81.7% pass (71 tests)20062025

Pass rate by mileage

how the DR's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage DR passes first time 82.7% of the time; by 50k that's 88.0%.

76%83%90%0k: 82.7% pass (625 tests)10k: 78.5% pass (628 tests)20k: 81.3% pass (343 tests)30k: 79.1% pass (211 tests)40k: 78.2% pass (110 tests)50k: 88.0% pass (75 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a DR

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
178 26.3 1.3×
steering and suspension
133 19.7 1.5×
brakes
123 18.2 1.0×
lamps and reflectors
50 7.4 0.8×
tyres and wheels
50 7.4 0.9×
drive system
41 6.1 2.2×
suspension
33 4.9 1.7×
reg plates and vin
28 4.1 1.7×
structure and attachments
22 3.3 1.0×
tyres
18 2.7 1.1×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the DR beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (SUZUKI AN400, SUZUKI DR-Z400S, YAMAHA RD350).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the DR.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2001 (90.0% pass). Weakest: 2009 (69.8%).

66%80%94%1988: 81.7% pass (82 tests)1991: 73.2% pass (56 tests)1992: 84.7% pass (85 tests)1993: 75.9% pass (112 tests)1994: 75.7% pass (111 tests)1995: 81.7% pass (290 tests)1996: 84.9% pass (146 tests)1997: 78.7% pass (122 tests)1998: 85.7% pass (119 tests)1999: 86.4% pass (66 tests)2000: 73.4% pass (124 tests)2001: 90.0% pass (60 tests)2009: 69.8% pass (63 tests)198819962009

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI DR FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI DR reliable?

The SUZUKI DR is less reliable than average for its class: 80.1% of its 2,112 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3557 of 5426 models.

What does a DR fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 26% of all defects recorded against failed DR tests.

What is the best year of DR to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2001-registered examples do best (90.0%) and 2009 worst (69.8%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a DR last?

The median DR shows 15,852 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 88.0% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.