PEUGEOT SPEEDFIGHT 3 50 LC ICEBLADE
What fails on a SPEEDFIGHT 3 50 LC ICEBLADE
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
18 | 29.5 |
| steering and suspension |
|
15 | 24.6 |
| brakes |
|
9 | 14.8 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
5 | 8.2 |
| fuel and exhaust |
|
5 | 8.2 |
| suspension |
|
3 | 4.9 |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
2 | 3.3 |
| tyres |
|
2 | 3.3 |
| reg plates and vin |
|
1 | 1.6 |
| body and structure |
|
1 | 1.6 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the SPEEDFIGHT 3 50 LC ICEBLADE beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (PEUGEOT SPEEDFIGHT, PIAGGIO ZIP, PIAGGIO NRG).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the SPEEDFIGHT 3 50 LC ICEBLADE.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2011 (77.6% pass). Weakest: 2011 (77.6%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.