KTM 350 EXC-F SIX DAYS 14
What fails on a 350 EXC-F SIX DAYS 14
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
14 | 41.2 |
| steering and suspension |
|
5 | 14.7 |
| wheels |
|
3 | 8.8 |
| reg plates and vin |
|
3 | 8.8 |
| suspension |
|
3 | 8.8 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
2 | 5.9 |
| brakes |
|
2 | 5.9 |
| audible warning (Horn) |
|
1 | 2.9 |
| tyres |
|
1 | 2.9 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the 350 EXC-F SIX DAYS 14 beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (SUZUKI AN400, SUZUKI DR-Z400S, YAMAHA RD350).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 350 EXC-F SIX DAYS 14.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2013 (83.0% pass). Weakest: 2013 (83.0%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.