KTM 350 EXC-F 13
Pass rate over time
The 350 EXC-F 13's first-time pass rate has risen 16.9 points since 2015, 67.8% to 84.7%.
What fails on a 350 EXC-F 13
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects | vs all bikes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
52 | 24.9 | 0.8× |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
40 | 19.1 | 1.9× |
| suspension |
|
24 | 11.5 | 3.0× |
| Identification of the vehicle |
|
20 | 9.6 | 9.7× |
| brakes |
|
17 | 8.1 | 0.4× |
| tyres and wheels |
|
14 | 6.7 | 0.5× |
| tyres |
|
13 | 6.2 | 1.5× |
| reg plates and vin |
|
12 | 5.7 | 2.0× |
| audible warning (Horn) |
|
9 | 4.3 | 5.5× |
| wheels |
|
8 | 3.8 | 14.9× |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the 350 EXC-F 13 beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (SUZUKI AN400, SUZUKI DR-Z400S, YAMAHA RD350).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 350 EXC-F 13.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2012 (79.4% pass). Weakest: 2013 (77.7%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.
KTM 350 EXC-F 13 FAQ
Is the KTM 350 EXC-F 13 reliable?
The KTM 350 EXC-F 13 is less reliable than average for its class: 78.4% of its 894 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3854 of 5426 models.
What does a 350 EXC-F 13 fail its MOT on most?
lighting and signalling — 25% of all defects recorded against failed 350 EXC-F 13 tests.