BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
76.7%
first-time pass rate
15.7%
failed outright
21,678
median miles at test
1,845
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The NINJA's first-time pass rate has fallen 9.1 points since 2006, 79.4% to 70.3%.

65%79%93%2006: 79.4% pass (136 tests)2007: 76.6% pass (124 tests)2008: 73.2% pass (127 tests)2009: 75.2% pass (113 tests)2010: 74.0% pass (123 tests)2011: 74.1% pass (135 tests)2012: 77.4% pass (133 tests)2013: 74.3% pass (144 tests)2014: 77.5% pass (138 tests)2015: 79.3% pass (116 tests)2016: 77.3% pass (88 tests)2017: 70.0% pass (80 tests)2018: 76.4% pass (55 tests)2019: 78.7% pass (61 tests)2020: 86.4% pass (44 tests)2021: 88.7% pass (62 tests)2022: 74.5% pass (47 tests)2023: 80.5% pass (41 tests)2025: 70.3% pass (37 tests)20062025

Pass rate by mileage

how the NINJA's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage NINJA passes first time 80.5% of the time; by 50k that's 62.7%.

59%72%84%0k: 80.5% pass (344 tests)10k: 78.4% pass (501 tests)20k: 76.5% pass (430 tests)30k: 76.7% pass (313 tests)40k: 70.8% pass (137 tests)50k: 62.7% pass (75 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a NINJA

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
224 32.8 1.8×
brakes
145 21.2 1.3×
steering and suspension
115 16.8 1.5×
tyres and wheels
65 9.5 1.7×
lamps and reflectors
31 4.5 0.8×
drive system
26 3.8 1.7×
fuel and exhaust
25 3.7 1.6×
reg plates and vin
23 3.4 1.8×
body and structure
15 2.2 1.4×
suspension
14 2 0.7×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the NINJA beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (HONDA CBR600F, YAMAHA YZF-R6, SUZUKI GSXR600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the NINJA.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2001 (86.7% pass). Weakest: 1995 (68.8%).

65%78%90%1994: 69.4% pass (72 tests)1995: 68.8% pass (128 tests)1996: 70.6% pass (153 tests)1997: 80.4% pass (51 tests)1998: 80.0% pass (275 tests)1999: 75.5% pass (151 tests)2000: 80.2% pass (91 tests)2001: 86.7% pass (105 tests)2002: 76.8% pass (177 tests)2003: 85.7% pass (63 tests)2005: 73.0% pass (100 tests)2007: 75.7% pass (115 tests)2008: 77.6% pass (85 tests)2009: 83.1% pass (65 tests)199420012009

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KAWASAKI NINJA FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KAWASAKI NINJA reliable?

The KAWASAKI NINJA is less reliable than average for its class: 76.7% of its 1,845 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #4095 of 5426 models.

What does a NINJA fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 33% of all defects recorded against failed NINJA tests.

What is the best year of NINJA to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2001-registered examples do best (86.7%) and 1995 worst (68.8%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a NINJA last?

The median NINJA shows 21,678 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 62.7% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.