BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

KAWASAKI AR50

49cc Petrol Class 1
70.2%
first-time pass rate
22.3%
failed outright
13,979
median miles at test
964
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The AR50's first-time pass rate has risen 22.3 points since 2006, 59.5% to 81.8%.

46%68%89%2006: 59.5% pass (111 tests)2007: 69.0% pass (84 tests)2008: 69.9% pass (73 tests)2009: 53.4% pass (73 tests)2010: 54.8% pass (73 tests)2011: 57.1% pass (63 tests)2012: 72.9% pass (48 tests)2013: 80.0% pass (40 tests)2014: 81.4% pass (43 tests)2015: 70.0% pass (40 tests)2016: 81.3% pass (32 tests)2022: 81.1% pass (37 tests)2023: 78.9% pass (38 tests)2025: 81.8% pass (33 tests)20062025

Pass rate by mileage

how the AR50's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage AR50 passes first time 72.5% of the time; by 20k that's 72.2%.

67%70%73%0k: 72.5% pass (287 tests)10k: 68.0% pass (425 tests)20k: 72.2% pass (212 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a AR50

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
353 45.7 3.8×
steering and suspension
162 21 3.5×
brakes
82 10.6 1.4×
drive system
47 6.1 4.6×
body and structure
42 5.4 6.3×
tyres and wheels
25 3.2 1.3×
lamps and reflectors
22 2.8 0.9×
fuel and exhaust
18 2.3 2.1×
reg plates and vin
12 1.6 1.8×
structure and attachments
10 1.3 1.1×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the AR50 beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (PEUGEOT SPEEDFIGHT, PIAGGIO ZIP, PIAGGIO NRG).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the AR50.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1994 (80.3% pass). Weakest: 1996 (58.9%).

55%70%85%1988: 71.8% pass (71 tests)1989: 68.4% pass (98 tests)1990: 71.6% pass (134 tests)1991: 63.2% pass (125 tests)1992: 74.1% pass (81 tests)1994: 80.3% pass (71 tests)1995: 70.4% pass (81 tests)1996: 58.9% pass (73 tests)1997: 76.8% pass (69 tests)198819921997

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KAWASAKI AR50 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KAWASAKI AR50 reliable?

The KAWASAKI AR50 is less reliable than average for its class: 70.2% of its 964 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #4715 of 5426 models.

What does a AR50 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 46% of all defects recorded against failed AR50 tests.

What is the best year of AR50 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1994-registered examples do best (80.3%) and 1996 worst (58.9%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a AR50 last?

The median AR50 shows 13,979 miles at test, and examples around 20k miles still pass 72.2% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.