BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ HONDA/CBR900 FIREBLADE
Model report · 2005–2025

HONDA CBR900 FIREBLADE

900cc Petrol Class 2
82.5%
first-time pass rate
10.8%
failed outright
26,021
median miles at test
492
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2016

The CBR900 FIREBLADE's first-time pass rate has fallen 7.0 points since 2006, 87.0% to 80.0%.

64%80%97%2006: 87.0% pass (46 tests)2007: 91.4% pass (35 tests)2008: 69.4% pass (36 tests)2009: 75.8% pass (33 tests)2010: 77.4% pass (31 tests)2016: 80.0% pass (30 tests)20062016

Pass rate by mileage

how the CBR900 FIREBLADE's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage CBR900 FIREBLADE passes first time 86.0% of the time; by 40k that's 83.1%.

79%83%87%10k: 86.0% pass (107 tests)20k: 80.1% pass (201 tests)30k: 84.1% pass (69 tests)40k: 83.1% pass (65 tests)10k30k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a CBR900 FIREBLADE

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects
lighting and signalling
42 31.6
brakes
31 23.3
steering and suspension
21 15.8
reg plates and vin
10 7.5
lamps and reflectors
9 6.8
tyres and wheels
7 5.3
fuel and exhaust
6 4.5
body and structure
3 2.3
drive system
2 1.5
structure and attachments
2 1.5

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the CBR900 FIREBLADE beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YZF-R1, HONDA CBR900RR, TRIUMPH DAYTONA).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CBR900 FIREBLADE.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1993 (89.7% pass). Weakest: 1996 (76.2%).

74%83%92%1993: 89.7% pass (68 tests)1994: 81.7% pass (60 tests)1996: 76.2% pass (101 tests)1997: 87.1% pass (70 tests)1998: 78.4% pass (51 tests)1999: 79.3% pass (87 tests)199319971999

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.