BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ HONDA/CBR600F-N
Model report · 2005–2025
81.0%
first-time pass rate
13.4%
failed outright
30,685
median miles at test
231
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate by mileage

how the CBR600F-N's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage CBR600F-N passes first time 80.6% of the time; by 40k that's 67.3%.

63%78%92%10k: 80.6% pass (31 tests)20k: 88.2% pass (68 tests)30k: 83.0% pass (53 tests)40k: 67.3% pass (52 tests)10k30k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a CBR600F-N

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects
brakes
24 28.6
steering and suspension
19 22.6
lighting and signalling
19 22.6
tyres and wheels
8 9.5
drive system
6 7.1
lamps and reflectors
2 2.4
fuel and exhaust
2 2.4
suspension
2 2.4
body and structure
1 1.2
driving controls
1 1.2

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the CBR600F-N beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (HONDA CBR600F, YAMAHA YZF-R6, SUZUKI GSXR600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CBR600F-N.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1992 (77.0% pass). Weakest: 1992 (77.0%).

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.