BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ HONDA/CBR600F-2
Model report · 2005–2025
82.1%
first-time pass rate
11.8%
failed outright
19,705
median miles at test
825
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2017

The CBR600F-2's first-time pass rate has fallen 16.3 points since 2006, 89.6% to 73.3%.

67%81%94%2006: 89.6% pass (96 tests)2007: 83.0% pass (94 tests)2008: 83.3% pass (78 tests)2009: 89.8% pass (49 tests)2010: 86.4% pass (44 tests)2011: 81.6% pass (49 tests)2012: 86.0% pass (43 tests)2013: 71.4% pass (49 tests)2014: 86.0% pass (43 tests)2015: 76.9% pass (39 tests)2016: 86.1% pass (36 tests)2017: 73.3% pass (30 tests)20062017

Pass rate by mileage

how the CBR600F-2's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage CBR600F-2 passes first time 93.8% of the time; by 40k that's 74.5%.

69%84%98%0k: 93.8% pass (192 tests)10k: 86.1% pass (223 tests)20k: 77.3% pass (185 tests)30k: 73.5% pass (117 tests)40k: 74.5% pass (51 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a CBR600F-2

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
57 26.9 1.1×
tyres and wheels
39 18.4 2.0×
lighting and signalling
30 14.2 0.6×
steering and suspension
29 13.7 1.0×
lamps and reflectors
15 7.1 0.8×
drive system
13 6.1 1.5×
fuel and exhaust
9 4.2 1.3×
structure and attachments
7 3.3 0.9×
Items Not Tested
7 3.3 4.0×
body and structure
6 2.8 1.3×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the CBR600F-2 beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (HONDA CBR600F, YAMAHA YZF-R6, SUZUKI GSXR600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CBR600F-2.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2003 (86.5% pass). Weakest: 1993 (68.1%).

64%77%90%1993: 68.1% pass (72 tests)1994: 71.8% pass (78 tests)2002: 85.3% pass (307 tests)2003: 86.5% pass (267 tests)199320022003

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HONDA CBR600F-2 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HONDA CBR600F-2 reliable?

The HONDA CBR600F-2 is less reliable than average for its class: 82.1% of its 825 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3165 of 5426 models.

What does a CBR600F-2 fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 27% of all defects recorded against failed CBR600F-2 tests.

What is the best year of CBR600F-2 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2003-registered examples do best (86.5%) and 1993 worst (68.1%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a CBR600F-2 last?

The median CBR600F-2 shows 19,705 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 74.5% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.