BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
92.5%
first-time pass rate
3.8%
failed outright
11,102
median miles at test
265
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate by mileage

how the XL1200L's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage XL1200L passes first time 94.9% of the time; by 20k that's 87.2%.

86%91%96%0k: 94.9% pass (118 tests)10k: 90.6% pass (96 tests)20k: 87.2% pass (39 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a XL1200L

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects
lamps and reflectors
6 28.6
lighting and signalling
5 23.8
reg plates and vin
2 9.5
steering and suspension
2 9.5
brakes
2 9.5
suspension
1 4.8
fuel and exhaust
1 4.8
structure and attachments
1 4.8
Identification of the vehicle
1 4.8

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the XL1200L beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (TRIUMPH BONNEVILLE, TRIUMPH THUNDERBIRD, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XLH 883).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the XL1200L.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2006 (96.6% pass). Weakest: 2008 (90.3%).

89%93%98%2006: 96.6% pass (58 tests)2008: 90.3% pass (72 tests)2009: 94.4% pass (72 tests)200620082009

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.