BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
87.9%
first-time pass rate
5.1%
failed outright
15,009
median miles at test
593
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2021

The FXWG's first-time pass rate has fallen 11.3 points since 2006, 94.6% to 83.3%.

76%88%100%2006: 94.6% pass (37 tests)2007: 90.2% pass (41 tests)2008: 88.9% pass (36 tests)2009: 85.3% pass (34 tests)2010: 93.5% pass (31 tests)2011: 96.7% pass (30 tests)2012: 80.0% pass (30 tests)2014: 93.8% pass (32 tests)2015: 94.3% pass (35 tests)2016: 80.6% pass (31 tests)2017: 91.4% pass (35 tests)2021: 83.3% pass (30 tests)20062021

Pass rate by mileage

how the FXWG's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage FXWG passes first time 86.8% of the time; by 30k that's 82.2%.

81%85%90%0k: 86.8% pass (212 tests)10k: 88.3% pass (137 tests)20k: 88.5% pass (113 tests)30k: 82.2% pass (45 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a FXWG

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
22 31.4 0.4×
lighting and signalling
13 18.6 0.4×
reg plates and vin
7 10 1.2×
lamps and reflectors
6 8.6 0.5×
steering and suspension
5 7.1 0.2×
fuel and exhaust
5 7.1 0.9×
tyres and wheels
4 5.7 0.3×
structure and attachments
3 4.3 0.7×
tyres
3 4.3 0.5×
drive system
2 2.9 0.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the FXWG beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF, HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTC, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XL1200C).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FXWG.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1981 (94.4% pass). Weakest: 1985 (81.7%).

79%88%97%1980: 94.0% pass (50 tests)1981: 94.4% pass (71 tests)1982: 86.3% pass (73 tests)1983: 84.6% pass (65 tests)1985: 81.7% pass (60 tests)198019821985

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXWG FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXWG reliable?

The HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXWG is more reliable than average for its class: 87.9% of its 593 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1639 of 5426 models.

What does a FXWG fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 31% of all defects recorded against failed FXWG tests.

What is the best year of FXWG to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1981-registered examples do best (94.4%) and 1985 worst (81.7%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a FXWG last?

The median FXWG shows 15,009 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 82.2% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.