BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
88.7%
first-time pass rate
6.0%
failed outright
18,250
median miles at test
871
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2023

The FXDS-C's first-time pass rate has risen 1.1 points since 2006, 88.9% to 90.0%.

70%85%100%2006: 88.9% pass (72 tests)2007: 89.9% pass (69 tests)2008: 85.0% pass (60 tests)2009: 94.9% pass (59 tests)2010: 88.5% pass (52 tests)2011: 89.3% pass (56 tests)2012: 89.8% pass (49 tests)2013: 87.5% pass (48 tests)2014: 87.2% pass (39 tests)2015: 90.0% pass (40 tests)2016: 92.5% pass (40 tests)2017: 79.1% pass (43 tests)2018: 90.0% pass (30 tests)2021: 91.7% pass (36 tests)2022: 75.0% pass (36 tests)2023: 90.0% pass (30 tests)20062023

Pass rate by mileage

how the FXDS-C's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage FXDS-C passes first time 89.8% of the time; by 40k that's 85.7%.

85%88%92%0k: 89.8% pass (177 tests)10k: 89.9% pass (276 tests)20k: 90.9% pass (164 tests)30k: 85.7% pass (112 tests)40k: 85.7% pass (49 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a FXDS-C

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
20 23.5 0.5×
lighting and signalling
17 20 0.4×
lamps and reflectors
16 18.8 0.6×
reg plates and vin
8 9.4 1.4×
fuel and exhaust
6 7.1 0.9×
steering and suspension
5 5.9 0.2×
Identification of the vehicle
4 4.7 2.0×
tyres and wheels
4 4.7 0.2×
suspension
3 3.5 0.3×
tyres
2 2.4 0.3×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the FXDS-C beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF, HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTC, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XL1200C).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FXDS-C.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1994 (93.3% pass). Weakest: 1998 (86.8%).

86%90%95%1994: 93.3% pass (75 tests)1995: 90.3% pass (103 tests)1996: 89.4% pass (66 tests)1997: 89.9% pass (258 tests)1998: 86.8% pass (317 tests)199419961998

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXDS-C FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXDS-C reliable?

The HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXDS-C is more reliable than average for its class: 88.7% of its 871 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1369 of 5426 models.

What does a FXDS-C fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 24% of all defects recorded against failed FXDS-C tests.

What is the best year of FXDS-C to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1994-registered examples do best (93.3%) and 1998 worst (86.8%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a FXDS-C last?

The median FXDS-C shows 18,250 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 85.7% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.