BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ HARLEY-DAVIDSON/FLSTFB FATBOY SP 1690 12
Model report · 2005–2025

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTFB FATBOY SP 1690 12

1690cc Petrol Class 2
91.6%
first-time pass rate
2.8%
failed outright
10,461
median miles at test
356
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2016–2023

The FLSTFB FATBOY SP 1690 12's first-time pass rate has risen 6.9 points since 2016, 83.7% to 90.6%.

80%90%100%2016: 83.7% pass (43 tests)2017: 97.3% pass (37 tests)2018: 93.3% pass (30 tests)2021: 91.7% pass (36 tests)2022: 88.9% pass (36 tests)2023: 90.6% pass (32 tests)20162023

Pass rate by mileage

how the FLSTFB FATBOY SP 1690 12's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage FLSTFB FATBOY SP 1690 12 passes first time 92.4% of the time; by 20k that's 89.5%.

89%91%93%0k: 92.4% pass (172 tests)10k: 91.2% pass (125 tests)20k: 89.5% pass (57 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a FLSTFB FATBOY SP 1690 12

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects
lamps and reflectors
6 42.9
tyres
2 14.3
tyres and wheels
2 14.3
structure and attachments
1 7.1
reg plates and vin
1 7.1
lighting and signalling
1 7.1
brakes
1 7.1

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the FLSTFB FATBOY SP 1690 12 beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF, HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTC, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XL1200C).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FLSTFB FATBOY SP 1690 12.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2011 (94.6% pass). Weakest: 2013 (87.5%).

86%91%96%2011: 94.6% pass (93 tests)2012: 92.0% pass (175 tests)2013: 87.5% pass (88 tests)201120122013

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.