BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ HARLEY-DAVIDSON/FLSTF FAT BOY
Model report · 2005–2025

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF FAT BOY

1584cc Petrol Class 2
87.6%
first-time pass rate
5.5%
failed outright
11,845
median miles at test
1,407
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2009–2025

The FLSTF FAT BOY's first-time pass rate has fallen 4.2 points since 2009, 93.9% to 89.7%.

79%88%97%2009: 93.9% pass (33 tests)2010: 88.0% pass (75 tests)2011: 81.9% pass (116 tests)2012: 84.2% pass (101 tests)2013: 89.1% pass (101 tests)2014: 86.7% pass (98 tests)2015: 86.4% pass (103 tests)2016: 91.6% pass (95 tests)2017: 83.3% pass (96 tests)2018: 90.4% pass (73 tests)2019: 92.0% pass (75 tests)2020: 83.9% pass (56 tests)2021: 90.8% pass (76 tests)2022: 84.7% pass (85 tests)2023: 92.4% pass (79 tests)2024: 88.9% pass (63 tests)2025: 89.7% pass (58 tests)20092025

Pass rate by mileage

how the FLSTF FAT BOY's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage FLSTF FAT BOY passes first time 89.4% of the time; by 40k that's 72.2%.

69%81%93%0k: 89.4% pass (587 tests)10k: 88.1% pass (471 tests)20k: 89.7% pass (174 tests)30k: 79.4% pass (107 tests)40k: 72.2% pass (36 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a FLSTF FAT BOY

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
38 27.7 0.4×
brakes
26 19 0.3×
lamps and reflectors
25 18.2 0.9×
tyres and wheels
12 8.8 0.4×
reg plates and vin
12 8.8 1.2×
steering and suspension
12 8.8 0.2×
fuel and exhaust
4 2.9 0.4×
tyres
4 2.9 0.4×
Identification of the vehicle
3 2.2 0.9×
body and structure
1 0.7 0.1×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the FLSTF FAT BOY beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF, HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTC, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XL1200C).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FLSTF FAT BOY.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2009 (94.0% pass). Weakest: 2006 (84.9%).

83%89%96%2006: 84.9% pass (403 tests)2007: 90.7% pass (442 tests)2008: 89.6% pass (260 tests)2009: 94.0% pass (50 tests)200620082009

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF FAT BOY FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF FAT BOY reliable?

The HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF FAT BOY is more reliable than average for its class: 87.6% of its 1,407 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1722 of 5426 models.

What does a FLSTF FAT BOY fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 28% of all defects recorded against failed FLSTF FAT BOY tests.

What is the best year of FLSTF FAT BOY to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2009-registered examples do best (94.0%) and 2006 worst (84.9%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a FLSTF FAT BOY last?

The median FLSTF FAT BOY shows 11,845 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 72.2% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.