BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ HARLEY-DAVIDSON/FAT BOB FXDF 103 1690 17
Model report · 2005–2025

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FAT BOB FXDF 103 1690 17

1690cc Petrol Class 2
89.6%
first-time pass rate
3.8%
failed outright
6,987
median miles at test
871
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2020–2025

The FAT BOB FXDF 103 1690 17's first-time pass rate has fallen 2.9 points since 2020, 92.8% to 89.9%.

82%89%95%2020: 92.8% pass (181 tests)2021: 91.0% pass (145 tests)2022: 90.2% pass (153 tests)2023: 87.6% pass (145 tests)2024: 84.3% pass (115 tests)2025: 89.9% pass (119 tests)20202025

Pass rate by mileage

how the FAT BOB FXDF 103 1690 17's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage FAT BOB FXDF 103 1690 17 passes first time 89.4% of the time; by 20k that's 93.9%.

84%90%95%0k: 89.4% pass (556 tests)10k: 86.0% pass (207 tests)20k: 93.9% pass (33 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a FAT BOB FXDF 103 1690 17

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lamps and reflectors
31 59.6 1.8×
suspension
6 11.5 0.9×
Identification of the vehicle
5 9.6 2.5×
brakes
4 7.7 0.1×
steering
3 5.8 0.8×
tyres
3 5.8 0.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the FAT BOB FXDF 103 1690 17 beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF, HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTC, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XL1200C).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FAT BOB FXDF 103 1690 17.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2016 (95.4% pass). Weakest: 2017 (88.8%).

87%92%97%2016: 95.4% pass (109 tests)2017: 88.8% pass (723 tests)20162017

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FAT BOB FXDF 103 1690 17 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HARLEY-DAVIDSON FAT BOB FXDF 103 1690 17 reliable?

The HARLEY-DAVIDSON FAT BOB FXDF 103 1690 17 is more reliable than average for its class: 89.6% of its 871 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1075 of 5426 models.

What does a FAT BOB FXDF 103 1690 17 fail its MOT on most?

lamps and reflectors — 60% of all defects recorded against failed FAT BOB FXDF 103 1690 17 tests.

How many miles will a FAT BOB FXDF 103 1690 17 last?

The median FAT BOB FXDF 103 1690 17 shows 6,987 miles at test, and examples around 20k miles still pass 93.9% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.